The bathroom debate

Just a few weeks ago, Brighton and Hove City Council made the decision to send parents a letter advising them to help their children choose their gender before starting primary school.  Parents were requested to inform the school of the child’s ‘preferred’ gender.  Many parents have been outraged at the suggestion.  This is simply a further step, since already some schools in the area have ‘gender-neutral’ toilets. 

At the same time, the US Justice Department filed a lawsuit against North Carolina for its law requiring individuals to use the lavatory corresponding with their birth gender.  North Carolina announced that it would sue the Justice Department for its attempt to nullify the legislation (House Bill 2(HB2)).  The legislation was implemented to protect the privacy and safety of citizens, and the debate simply highlights the international debate currently raging over bathroom access.

Whilst many citizens are outraged, many others welcome the change and actively pursue the emergence of a society where male/female distinctives are completely blurred.  If we are to understand the reason for this, we have to look beyond the actual circumstances to the pagan worldview which drives the genderless agenda.  Our good friend Dr Peter Jones, founder of truthXchange ( ) has studied the subject in depth and we have reproduced his excellent article here:

What has been for millennia a self-evident truth has become within a year or so unthinkable prejudice.  The principled experts of the twentieth century, Ringo Starr and Bruce Springsteen, have quickly jumped into the moral crusade of ethical outrage, amazed that the state of North Carolina would refuse to allow grown men to use the ladies’ restrooms.

An employee of a Catholic university (Loyola Marymount) committed cultural blasphemy by stating that there are only two genders (a view entirely compatible with Catholicism).  The university, however, has suspended her and is currently investigating her for a ‘hate crime.’

It gets more manifestly insane. Students at my alma mater, Cardiff University, and in other UK schools, are demanding the installation of women’s sanitary bins in male toilets ‘for men who menstruate.’  This is logical lunacy.  The inevitable demand for urinals in women’s restrooms will surely follow.  This demand actually affirms the opposite of what these progressives claim, forcing them to admit that women pretending to be men still need sanitary bins, because they menstruate, and men don’t.  Human sexuality is defined by an objective biological binary trait—either ‘XY’ or ‘XX’ chromosomes.  But by using the term ‘gender’ to mean not one’s biological sex but one’s sense of being male or female, moral outrage can find full expression.  Laws that can put you in jail are no longer based on objective biology but on subjective, changeable feelings.

What is the deep motivation for this bizarre state of affairs?

This ‘faith’ in feelings, which disregards biological objectivity, is both mental insanity and spiritual rebellion.  While we’ve never needed bathroom humour, presently we do need some serious bathroom theology!

Clear-headed theology reveals what is happening in our Left-leaning, progressive world.  We are witnessing the reappearance of an old heresy, Gnosticism.  The Gnostics rejected the flesh and embraced the spirit.  For them, the physical, created world was an evil thing, made by Satan.  They believed the spirit revealed the true ‘god within,’ as do many today, in search of their ‘higher selves.’  Interestingly, the ancient Gnostics also rejected creational sexuality and sought the higher form of ‘androgyny,’ the experience of being both male and female—which is the same rejection of the male/female gender binary that we observe today.

Here are a few examples:

Oberlin College, founded by two Presbyterian ministers, is now committed to ‘finding a space that…defies the binary in our society…that you were assigned.’

All five of Scotland’s main political parties have pledged to push for a ‘non-binary gender legal recognition…in all areas of life.’

The goal of yoga, according to a serious practitioner, is to create ‘… direct awareness of the unity of everything, to break through the usual false binaries within which we tend to live.’

One of the ‘false binaries’ that Hindu thinking eliminates is that between the Creator and the creature, serving a deeply religious goal.  This suppression exhibits, as we say at truthXchange, the conflict between the only two worldviews, Oneism and Twoism.  We now observe a growing worldview by which people, especially young people, are taught to reject differences and distinctions.

Recently a deliberately set-up video showed US college students so brainwashed that they refused to counter the outlandish claims of a 5”9’ white man to be a 6”4’ Asian woman!  Their insane response was: ‘How can I judge what is true for you?’

Clearly, the rejection of any objective binary is not limited to sexuality.  It is also a new theory of education.  One education expert said:

One of the key strategies to unsettle and trouble entrenched ways of [children’s] thinking is to blur all kinds of boundaries—the clean categorical identity boundaries that support binary thinking as well as the boundaries between academic fields.  This is why I think it is so useful to deploy a binary-busting, Queer perspective across a range of disciplinary contexts.

The seeds of Eastern mysticism sown in the West a generation ago are bearing copious fruit.  The legendary Buddhist spiritual teacher Thich Nhat Hanh, influential among UN leaders, declared: ‘We are here to awaken from our illusion of separateness.’  He was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1967.

Separateness is not an illusion, in two senses.  In a positive sense, we are separate (distinct) from the Creator as his creatures, made in his image, males different from females.   In a negative sense, we are separated from God by our sin.  In the cross of his Son, Jesus, we can know forgiveness and personal reconciliation with the Creator and, through this, rediscover the sanity of the objective distinctions God placed in the creation for our good and his glory.


There are currently no comments on this post

Post a Comment

Your comment will have to be approved by a site administrator before it is shown on the site so please be patient.

Latest News

View all

Illiberal liberals

23rd June 2017 6:28 PM

Perhaps the announcement by Tim Farron this week, that he realises his Christian faith is incompatible with the postmodern ideaology of the West is an indication of the illiberal attitude of modern society to anyone claiming to live a genuine and committed Christian life . . .

Revelation on Revelation

20th February 2017 3:52 PM

The book of Revelation has specific revelation for the end-time church, and a blessing is in store for all those who read it . . .

If Trump blesses Israel, he will be blessed

24th January 2017 3:25 PM

Only a few days after he was inaugurated, President Donald Trump’s pledge to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem was on the media agenda following a 30 minute call between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. 

Israel in the news

3rd January 2017 11:55 AM

The United Nations Security Council’s recent adoption of Resolution 2334, which condemns Israeli settlements in the West Bank, has brought to our collective attention yet again the unique role assigned to Israel in world affairs . . . 

Post-referendum chaos

12th December 2016 11:06 AM

Perhaps most significantly, the reaction to the Brexit vote has exposed how undemocratic Britain is – a nation which prides itself on its democracy . . .

Getting rid of God

9th December 2016 11:01 AM

. . . until Jesus is crowned King of Kings and all knees bow to him, Satan will continue to pursue his interests in this world . . .

website designed and maintained by adept